On 14-07-2007 10:06:35 +0200, Niels Nes wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:03:32AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 14-07-2007 09:43:49 +0200, Niels Nes wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:08:55AM +0200, Stefan Manegold wrote:
Ok, before we start changing these things back and forth:
Anyone else who has an opinion on how M4 (server), M5 (server), SQL4, SQL5, XQuery(4) should reveal their version numbers at startup-/module-loading time, and whether the differences between M4 & M5 should/need to be increased by having different/non-aligned/"inconsistend" welcome messages?
Face it. The architecture is inconsistent. In M4 your "on port " message was sort of correct and useful, while on M5 this is incorrect/irrelevant. Why ?
Because if you use auto-sensing, then the port may be something else. Something that M5 + Sabaoth + Merovingian heavily depends on. That's why Sabaoth now prints the connection that actually is used on M5 to do the equivalence of Stefan's original "on port %d" message.