20 Apr
2009
20 Apr
'09
7:48 a.m.
On 19-04-2009 21:33:02 +0200, Martin Kersten wrote:
} } - mal_unset_lock(mal_remoteLock, "remote.list");
^^^
Was this intended? A loop through a shared linked list is made here, which potentially can be modified while you walk through it, hence the lock that was here.
the locks are now placed one level higher in the calling structure. It was a consequence of first protecting RMTconnect structures.
Conclusion, it was intended and correct :) (but just not documented)