[Monetdb-developers] [Fwd: ! Compiling 'Current' pathfinder: Results DIFFER from 2008.04.02_00-09-03's !]
How do I have to interpret this result? -- Testing was not possible due to ... (e.g., sf)? Jan -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: ! Compiling 'Current' pathfinder: Results DIFFER from 2008.04.02_00-09-03's ! Datum: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:20:39 +0200 (CEST) Von: monet@cwi.nl (Project account) An: jan.rittinger@in.tum.de, E.Sidirourgos@cwi.nl, Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl, Sjoerd.Mullender@cwi.nl Compilation results of pathfinder in /ufs/monet/Testing/Current DIFFER from those of 2008.04.02_00-09-03 ! Summary: ======== * 2 Systems no longer relevant !! 12 Systems now DON'T produce output !! * 4 Systems still don't produce output * 55 Tests no longer relevant Maybe YOUR checkins since 02.04.2008, 00:09:03 caused some of the problems: buildtools MonetDB java clients MonetDB4 MonetDB5 pathfinder jan.rittinger@in.tum.de lsidir@cwi.nl Check http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Development/TestWeb/Current/pathfinder/ for details ! Details: ======== 2 Systems no longer relevant: F6-I64/32d, F6-I64/64d 12 Systems now DON'T produce output: D4.0-G32/32d, F6-G32/32d, F8-G32/32d, F8-G64/32d, F8-G64/64d, F8-G64/64s, F8-I64/32d, F8-I64/64d, G1.12.11.1-G32/32d, R4-I64/64d, S5.10-G32/32d, W5.1-I32/32d 4 Systems still don't produce output: D8.11.0-G32/32d, W5.1-M32/32d, W5.2-I64/64d, W5.2-M64/64d 55 Tests no longer relevant: conf/bin/monetdb-xquery-config, conf/bin/monetdb-xquery-config.bat, compiler/bin/pfsql, compiler/bin/pf, compiler/bin/pfopt, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_pf_standoff.so, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_pf_support.so, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/pf_standoff.mil, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/pathfinder.mil, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/xrpc_client.mil, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/pf_support.mil, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/xrpc_server.mil, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_xrpc_server.so, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_xrpc_client.so, runtime/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_pathfinder.so, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/content.html, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/ctit.png, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/sf.bmp, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/index.html, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/monetdb_med_abstract.png, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/admin.js, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/title.html, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/cwi_logo.p ng, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/xrpcwebclient.js, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/admin.xq, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/ctit.gif, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/multimedian_logo.png, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/tum-logo.gif, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/menu.html, runtime/xrpc/admin/share/MonetDB/xrpc/admin/cwi.bmp, runtime/xrpc/export/share/MonetDB/xrpc/export/index.html, runtime/xrpc/export/share/MonetDB/xrpc/export/xrpc.html, runtime/xrpc/export/share/MonetDB/xrpc/export/export.xq, runtime/xrpc/export/share/MonetDB/xrpc/export/xrpc-mod.xq, runtime5/lib/MonetDB5/xquery.mal, runtime5/lib/MonetDB5/lib/lib_xquery.so, modules/pftijah/lib/MonetDB4/pftijah.mil, modules/pftijah/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_pftijah.so, modules/probxml/lib/MonetDB4/lib/lib_probxml.so, modules/probxml/lib/MonetDB4/probxml.mil, src/tools/bin/Mserver, src/tools/bin/Mbeddedxq, src/tools/lib/libembeddedxq.so, src/sqlhelpers/ xmlshred/bin/pfshred, src/sqlhelpers/serializer/bin/pfserialize.pl, src/sqlhelpers/db2tools/bin/pfcreatetables.sh, src/sqlhelpers/db2tools/bin/pfloadtables.sh, dist/MonetDB-XQuery-0.23.0.tar.gz, rpm/rpm/rpmmacros, rpm/rpm/rpmrc, rpm/rpm/RPMS/MonetDB4-XQuery-0.23.0-1_.rpm, rpm/rpm/RPMS/MonetDB4-XQuery-debuginfo-0.23.0-1_.rpm, rpm/rpm/RPMS/MonetDB4-XQuery-devel-0.23.0-1_.rpm, rpm/rpm/SRPMS/MonetDB4-XQuery-0.23.0-1.src.rpm, UNKNOWN/rpm/SPECS/MonetDB-XQuery.spec -- Jan Rittinger Database Systems Technische Universität München (Germany) http://www-db.in.tum.de/~rittinge/
On 03-04-2008 09:31:56 +0200, Jan Rittinger wrote:
How do I have to interpret this result? -- Testing was not possible due to ... (e.g., sf)?
probably disk full, see Stefan's earlier message.
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:51:24AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 03-04-2008 09:31:56 +0200, Jan Rittinger wrote:
How do I have to interpret this result? -- Testing was not possible due to ... (e.g., sf)?
probably disk full, see Stefan's earlier message.
Indeed --- after Sjoerd and I had removed some legacy data end of last week and during the weekend, our testing server apperas to be full, again --- unfortunately, I (most probably) won't have any time to investigate and solve the problem before May 1th 2008 --- since my scripts are admittedly not too much documented, I cannot easily ask someelse to take care either. Sorry for the inconveniences! Stefan ps: One "quick" idea for "insiders": maybe we could consider archiving only the last 10 days (last digit of day-of-month (DOM)) instead of the last 30/31 days (two digit day-of-month (DOM)) ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
participants (3)
-
Fabian Groffen
-
Jan Rittinger
-
Stefan Manegold