On 06-09-2006 18:31:04 +0200, Ying Zhang wrote:

Hi,

Mapiclient and jdbcclient use different ways to present the results of an XQuery query:

$ mapiclnt -lx <example>{<doc>Hello World</doc>/text()}</example> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <XQueryResult><example>Hello World</example></XQueryResult>

$ java -jar $INSTALL_DIR/share/MonetDB/lib/jdbcclient-1.4.jar -lxquery Welcome to the MonetDB interactive JDBC terminal! Type \q to quit, \h for a list of available commands auto commit mode: on monetdb-> <example>{<doc>Hello World</doc>/text()}</example> monetdb=> <xquery> <result> <row> <xml><example>Hello World</example></xml> </row> </result> </xquery>

Why do we need two different ways? Isn't it inconsistent?

Yes it is inconsistent, if you consider the two clients to be made for the same purpose. While MapiClient has (had) some different output mode, JdbcClient has only two, one being tabular aligned result, such as the MySQL and PostgreSQL consoles produce. The other is XML output as described in the SQL/XML standards paper: it implements the way to transform a tabular result into an XML structure. I thought that an xquery user would simply like XML output over tabular output, hence you get this fancy XML structure. However, what you see is the representation of a tabular result; exactly what JDBC was designed for, and exactly what JDBC v4.x is going to do with SQL/XML: put it in strings in SQL-ish tabular structures. The only thing that suprises me is the "<example>", but as I'm far from an XML serialisation expert, the answer whether that is correct behaviour is up to Wouter or Jan R.