Fwd: * Re: * [Monetdb-developers] MonetDB on FreeBSD?
Hi, I've included the full alarm.glue.c in the following url: http://www.freshway.biz/files/MonetDB-alarm.glue.c.txt I hope it helps. Thanks, Arnoud
When did you download MonetDB-4.9.3.tar.gz ? Yesterday or today? since this morning 3:08 hours the is a new version at http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Current/.DailyBuilds./SourceT... could you please try this one? make sure that you start from scratch, i.e., remove all traces of th old version(s) before starting with the new one. Stefan On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:21:56AM +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
Hi,
I've included the full alarm.glue.c in the following url: http://www.freshway.biz/files/MonetDB-alarm.glue.c.txt
I hope it helps.
Thanks,
Arnoud
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
The last gmake was from the nightly build of yesterday.
The build from today completes the gmake without errors ! :D
But when I ran a gmake check I got the following error:
gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/scripts'
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/scripts'
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/scripts'
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3'
chmod a+x lady.gif
gmake check-TESTS
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3'
-a: not found
python: not found
python: not found
exec: python: not found
FAIL: RunMtest
===================
1 of 1 tests failed
===================
gmake[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3'
gmake[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3'
gmake[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3'
gmake: *** [check] Error 2
web02# locate bin/python
/usr/local/bin/python-shared2.3
/usr/local/bin/python2.3
Nevertheless, when I ran a gmake install, it ran just fine :)
Thanks for the help!
I'm looking forward to the stable build on monday.
Greetings,
Arnoud Vermeer
On 1/20/06, Stefan Manegold
When did you download MonetDB-4.9.3.tar.gz ? Yesterday or today?
since this morning 3:08 hours the is a new version at
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Current/.DailyBuilds./SourceT...
could you please try this one?
make sure that you start from scratch, i.e., remove all traces of th old version(s) before starting with the new one.
Stefan
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:21:56AM +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
Hi,
I've included the full alarm.glue.c in the following url: http://www.freshway.biz/files/MonetDB-alarm.glue.c.txt
I hope it helps.
Thanks,
Arnoud
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
On 20-01-2006 14:01:45 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
The last gmake was from the nightly build of yesterday.
The build from today completes the gmake without errors ! :D
Congats :)
web02# locate bin/python /usr/local/bin/python-shared2.3 /usr/local/bin/python2.3
What is the output of `which python`? Apart from that, there are some tests known to fail right now, so it won't be completely succesful.
web02# which python
python: Command not found.
It's not located in my env, although I've compiled version 2.3, strange...
On 1/20/06, Fabian Groffen
On 20-01-2006 14:01:45 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
The last gmake was from the nightly build of yesterday.
The build from today completes the gmake without errors ! :D
Congats :)
web02# locate bin/python /usr/local/bin/python-shared2.3 /usr/local/bin/python2.3
What is the output of `which python`? Apart from that, there are some tests known to fail right now, so it won't be completely succesful.
On 20-01-2006 14:07:09 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
web02# which python python: Command not found.
It's not located in my env, although I've compiled version 2.3, strange...
Your python seems to be called python2.3, so `which python2.3` will tell you if it's in your path at all. If so, I think the 'python' symlink is missing, perhaps because it was installed in /usr/local.
Ok, that was my guess to so I did:
ln -s /usr/local/bin/python2.3 /usr/local/bin/python
Now when I run Mtest.py I get the following error:
web02# /usr/local/bin/Mtest.py -r
IGNORE = ^#
RECURSIVE = True
QUIET = 0
M5 = 0
M4 = 0
TIMEOUT = 60
CONTEXT = -C1
ACCURACY = 1
/usr/local/bin/monetdb-config: not found
Mtest.py: ERROR: Could not find "monetdb-config" in your $PATH:
/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin
:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin
It should find the monetdb-config in /usr/local/bin
web02# locate monetdb-config
/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config
/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.bat
/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.bat.in
/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.in
/usr/local/bin/monetdb-config
/usr/local/bin/monetdb-config.bat
Any ideas?
Arnoud
On 1/20/06, Fabian Groffen
On 20-01-2006 14:07:09 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
web02# which python python: Command not found.
It's not located in my env, although I've compiled version 2.3, strange...
Your python seems to be called python2.3, so `which python2.3` will tell you if it's in your path at all. If so, I think the 'python' symlink is missing, perhaps because it was installed in /usr/local.
is /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config executable? Stefan On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:25:42PM +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
Ok, that was my guess to so I did: ln -s /usr/local/bin/python2.3 /usr/local/bin/python
Now when I run Mtest.py I get the following error:
web02# /usr/local/bin/Mtest.py -r IGNORE = ^# RECURSIVE = True QUIET = 0 M5 = 0 M4 = 0 TIMEOUT = 60 CONTEXT = -C1 ACCURACY = 1 /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config: not found
Mtest.py: ERROR: Could not find "monetdb-config" in your $PATH: /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin :/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin
It should find the monetdb-config in /usr/local/bin
web02# locate monetdb-config /usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config /usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.bat /usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.bat.in /usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/src/tools/monetdb-config.in /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config.bat
Any ideas?
Arnoud
On 1/20/06, Fabian Groffen
wrote: On 20-01-2006 14:07:09 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
web02# which python python: Command not found.
It's not located in my env, although I've compiled version 2.3, strange...
Your python seems to be called python2.3, so `which python2.3` will tell you if it's in your path at all. If so, I think the 'python' symlink is missing, perhaps because it was installed in /usr/local.
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
sh /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config dit work, so I compiled bash and syslinked
it
ln -s /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/bin/bash
after this I reran /usr/local/bin/Mtest.py and got the following errors
http://www.freshway.biz/files/MonetDB-Mtest.py.txt
so I reran ./configure and gmake again.
My gmake check now dit spill out a lot more checks.
--
bat_cast_makes_writable.SF-1238930.stable.out.FILTERED and
bat_cast_makes_writable.SF-1238930.test.out.FILTERED are equal.
bat_cast_makes_writable.SF-1238930.stable.err.FILTERED and
bat_cast_makes_writable.SF-1238930.test.err.FILTERED are equal.
15:40:57> tests/BugDay_2005-12-19_4.9.3/pump_properties.SF-1267155.milS
(<=60,60,60) ... 0.082s
pump_properties.SF-1267155.stable.out.FILTERED and pump_properties.SF-
1267155.test.out.FILTERED are equal.
pump_properties.SF-1267155.stable.err.FILTERED and pump_properties.SF-
1267155.test.err.FILTERED are equal.
15:40:58> tests/BugDay_2005-12-19_4.9.3/void_multiplex.SF-1280802.milS
(<=60,60,60) ... 0.079s
void_multiplex.SF-1280802.stable.out.FILTERED and void_multiplex.SF-
1280802.test.out.FILTERED are equal.
void_multiplex.SF-1280802.stable.err.FILTERED and void_multiplex.SF-
1280802.test.err.FILTERED are equal.
15:40:58> tests/BugDay_2005-12-19_4.9.3/merge_properties.SF-1283842.milS
(<=60,60,60) ... 0.087s
--
So this seems promising, but then I get:
!ERROR: Testing FAILED SIGNIFICANTLY !
9 out of 302 tests could not be executed
1 out of 302 tests produced slightly different output
7 out of 302 tests produced SIGNIFICANTLY different output
First, check the testing results in
/usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/mTests/index.html
!
Then, fix the problems by:
- fixing sources and test scripts
- fixing stable output by hand
- approving test output by Mapprove.py (cf. Mapprove.py -?)
After that, re-run Mtest.
uhhh okay?
gmake install finishes ok...
after the recompile, the output of Mtest.py stays the same.
Any ideas?
On 1/20/06, Stefan Manegold
is /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config executable?
Stefan
On 20-01-2006 15:47:39 +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
sh /usr/local/bin/monetdb-config dit work, so I compiled bash and syslinked it ln -s /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/bin/bash
after this I reran /usr/local/bin/Mtest.py and got the following errors
Yeah, try Mtest.py -r . (recursive from the directory you're in)
so I reran ./configure and gmake again.
My gmake check now dit spill out a lot more checks.
[snip]
So this seems promising, but then I get:
!ERROR: Testing FAILED SIGNIFICANTLY !
9 out of 302 tests could not be executed 1 out of 302 tests produced slightly different output 7 out of 302 tests produced SIGNIFICANTLY different output
First, check the testing results in /usr/home/funzoneq/MonetDB-4.9.3/mTests/index.html !
This is what I was talking about. Some tests are known to fail. All in all, most tests seem to run fine. You can compare the results against our testing systems: http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Current/MonetDB/.mTests103/in...
uhhh okay?
So: Yes.
Any ideas?
See above.
participants (3)
-
Arnoud Vermeer
-
Fabian Groffen
-
Stefan Manegold