On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:

On 11-01-2007 16:55:16 +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:

...

For the time being, I vote for reviving the odbc and java/jdbc tests in sql (as I did and am doing).

I think this is a bad idea, and it should not be done.

well, for now I think having the MIL tests in MonetDB4, the MAL tests in MonetDB5 the SQL tests in sql, the XQuery tests in pathfinder is a reasonably good idea. the sample programs that are used by these tests --- no matter whether they are written in C or java, and no matter whether they use plain MAPI, ODBC or JDBC stay where they belong, i.e., in clients. independend of that, how (if at all???) can I run the JDBC tests in case the respective jar and programs have already been built, i.e., without using ant; i.e., how do I have to modify (e.g.) ======== $ cat sql/src/jdbc/tests/Tests/Test_Cautocommit.SQL -------- #!/bin/sh URL="jdbc:monetdb://${HOST}:${MAPIPORT}/${TSTDB}?user=monetdb&password=monetdb${JDBC_EXTRA_ARGS}" Mlog -x "ant -emacs -buildfile ${TSTSRCDIR}/../build.xml -Dbuilddir=${TSTBLDDIR}/../ -Djdbc_url=\"${URL}\" -Djardir=${TSTBLDDIR}/../../ ${TST}" ======== to do something usefull, in case I have only the above script and ======== $ l `monetdb-clients-config --pkgdatadir`/lib -------- total 200 drwxr-s--- 2 manegold ins1 4096 Jan 10 23:15 ./ drwxr-s--- 7 manegold ins1 4096 Jan 10 23:15 ../ -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 110587 Jan 10 23:15 jdbcclient-1.5.jar* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 76159 Jan 10 23:15 monetdb-1.5-jdbc.jar* ======== $ l `monetdb-clients-config --pkgdatadir`/Tests -------- total 56 drwxr-s--- 2 manegold ins1 4096 Jan 10 23:15 ./ drwxr-s--- 7 manegold ins1 4096 Jan 10 23:15 ../ -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 2045 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Cautocommit.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 1520 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Cmanycon.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 3184 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Csavepoints.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 2091 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Ctransaction.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 3069 Jan 10 23:15 Test_PStimedate.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 4298 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Rbooleans.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 4232 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Rmetadata.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 2275 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Rpositioning.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 3676 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Rtimedate.class* -rwxr-xr-x 1 manegold ins1 2442 Jan 10 23:15 Test_Sbatching.class* ======== thanks in advance! Stefan -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |

On 11-01-2007 19:12:33 +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:

...

well, for now I think having the MIL tests in MonetDB4, the MAL tests in MonetDB5 the SQL tests in sql, the XQuery tests in pathfinder is a reasonably good idea.

So, first for some reason you're going to split all repositories into a number of them, to later spaghetti-connect them again, making me wonder why then you didn't merge all repositories into one in the first place. A split of tests targeted to components is ok, provided you ensure that they address

Fabian Groffen wrote: the correct component. For tests using e.g. both MAL/SQL we have to find a solution. Ala, this area should be convenient but not critical at this stage.