Well. If you're not linking against the libraries, I'm not sure it makes any difference.


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Basil Peace <grv87@yandex.ru> wrote:
Currently I'm not.
I'm going to 1) include MonetDB in deployment package 2) use foreign wrapper
data for PostgreSQL, which has to be compiled against MonetDB headers.

--
Basil Peace

From: users-list [mailto:users-list-bounces+grv87=yandex.ru@monetdb.org] On
Behalf Of Christopher Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:01 PM
To: Communication channel for MonetDB users
Subject: Re: MonetDB licensing

Are you going to modify MonetDB?

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Basil Peace <grv87@yandex.ru> wrote:
Currently MonetDB is licensed under `fork` of MPL 1.1. This is free software
license, but it is not compatible with GPL (
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL ). Are there some plans to
change license, e.g. to upgrade to MPL 2.0?

I'm asking since I'm planning big project (under GPLv3) just now, and I need
to choose backend database. I like MonetDB, but GPL incompatibility stopped
me.

Best regards,
Basil Peace
_______________________________________________
users-list mailing list
users-list@monetdb.org
https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list


_______________________________________________
users-list mailing list
users-list@monetdb.org
https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list