------------------ Original ------------------
Date: Fri, Jul 26, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Monetdb copy binary time varys very
much!
Oops, correct, for binary copies it does not recognize it
On 7/26/13 4:11 PM, Angelasweet wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> I follow you advise, and there is error as follows:
>
> ERROR = !COPY INTO: cannot pass number of records when
using binary COPY
> INTO in: "copy 200000 records binary into tmatch
>
from('/data/writeBinaryWM/id','/data/writeBinaryWM/0','/data/writeBinaryWM/1','/data/writeBinaryWM/2','/data/writeBinaryWM/3','/data/writeBinaryWM/4',
>
'/data/writeBinaryWM/5','/data/writeBinaryWM/6','/data/writeBinaryWM/7','/data/writeBinaryWM/8','/data/writeBinaryWM/9','/data/writeBinaryWM/10',
'/data/writeBinaryWM/11', '/data/writeBinaryWM/12',
'/data/writeBinaryWM/13', '/data/writeBinaryWM/14',
'/data/writeBinaryWM/15', '/data/writeBinaryWM/16',
'/data/writeBinaryWM/17', '/data/writeBinaryWM/18',
'/data/writeBinaryWM/19' )"
> !current transaction is aborted (please ROLLBACK)
>
>
> 2013/7/26 Martin Kersten <
Martin.Kersten@cwi.nl
>
<mailto:Martin.Kersten@cwi.nl>>
>
> This runs shows expected flushing.
>
> You might get somewhat better performance when you
follow
> the advice in
>
http://www.monetdb.org/__Documentation/Cookbooks/__SQLrecipes/LoadingBulkData
>
<http://www.monetdb.org/Documentation/Cookbooks/SQLrecipes/LoadingBulkData>
> e.g. use COPY 44000000 RECORDS ....
>
> The COPY INTO forms mentioned so far share one
important drawback.
> When a lot of data is to be inserted, the server
doesn't know how
> much memory to allocate for the tables, and so will
likely allocate
> too little. This means that during the insertion
process, the server
> has to grow the allocated memory area. This can be an
expensive
> operation. Therefore, it is better to give the server
a count of
> how many records are to be inserted:
>
> COPY n RECORDS INTO table FROM 'file';
>
> Here n should be a number that is at least as large as
the actual
> number of records to be inserted. If the file contains
more than n
> records, only n will be inserted, if the file contains
fewer, all
> values will be inserted. Giving a higher number is
especially
> useful if multiple COPY INTO queries are to be done on
the same
> table. The first COPY INTO, when the table is still
empty, should
> be the total count of to-be-inserted values so that the
server will
> allocate enough memory when the tables are first
created (they are
> only really created once data is inserted).
> On 7/26/13 10:58 AM, integrity wrote:
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> *From: * "Martin Kersten"<
Martin.Kersten@cwi.nl
>
<mailto:Martin.Kersten@cwi.nl>__>;
> *Date: * Fri, Jul 26, 2013 04:46 PM
> *To: * "users-list"<
users-list@__monetdb.org
>
<mailto:users-list@monetdb.org>>;
> *Subject: * Re: Monetdb copy binary time varys very
much!
>
>
> Hi,
> You should plot the times of each of your runs to
see the trend.
> This single run may be an outlier, which could come
from anything
> in your system environment. Even a seemingly
harmless concurrent
> program using significant memory could compete with
MonetDB.
>
> And indeed, at some point you will see disk IO.
>
>
> regards, Martin
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
>
users-list@monetdb.org
<mailto:users-list@monetdb.org>
>
http://mail.monetdb.org/__mailman/listinfo/users-list
>
<http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list>
>
> _________________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
>
users-list@monetdb.org
<mailto:users-list@monetdb.org>
>
http://mail.monetdb.org/__mailman/listinfo/users-list
>
<http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
>
users-list@monetdb.org
>
http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list
>
_______________________________________________
users-list mailing list
users-list@monetdb.org
http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list
.