Stefan Manegold wrote:
(Why don't you simply set the "reply-to:" header in your posting accordingly?) (I did it with this posting ;-))
I don't know what your intentions were, but you set the reply-to to yourself.
My intention was to make your user agent (respectively the mail protocol) send your reply to both the mailing list and myself "even" if you simply say "reply" and not "group-reply"/"reply-all" or the like. I did this by setting the "Reply-To:" header to both the mailing list address and my own address --- I guess, that's how it is supposed to work ;-) (of course, since I am subscribed and do read this mailing-list, I could have omitted my own address from the "Reply-To:" header ...)
I expect the mailing list provider to set the stuff correctly, like all those other mailing list providers do (for instance the mozdev mailing lists).
Here's what SF recommends about setting the reply-to automatically: ========= MonetDB-users Mailing list Configuration Help reply_goes_to_list Option reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in messages flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped. Setting this value to either This list or Explicit address causes Mailman to insert a specific Reply-To: header in all messages, overriding the header in the original message if necessary (Explicit address inserts the value of reply_to_address). There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header. One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey their valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it much more difficult to send private replies. See eply-To' Munging Considered Harmful for a general discussion of this issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion. Some mailing lists have restricted posting privileges, with a parallel list devoted to discussions. Examples are atches' or heckin' lists, where software changes are posted by a revision control system, but discussion about the changes occurs on a developers mailing list. To support these types of mailing lists, select Explicit address and set the Reply-To: address below to point to the parallel list. Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. _X_ Poster ___ This list ___ Explicit address ======== Hence, the point is basically: Since mailman does not seem to allow to extend the Reply-To: header, but only to overwrite it, one should better not touch it ... we can of course set it to "This list" anyway --- I'll check this with Sjoerd on Monday...
Hm, at a first glance, this looks as if libbz[2] was not found by configure, but the code / makefiles do not properly check whether libbz2 is indeed available ... "someone" needs to check this ...
That was my diagnosis also. But I think the appropriate ifdefs are there.
More importantly: Which version of MonetDB are we dealing with ???
CVS HEAD.
as of when?
tarball stable used to compile, will ask whether it still compiles on updated machine. (Fink was run)
Yep, this might be valuable info to localize the problem. Stefan -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |