On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Stefan Manegold wrote:
- Test scripts must be named according to the following conventions:
SF-<bug-report-id>.<descriptive-name>.*
While working with the bugs again, I found out why I did it different like this before:
<descriptive-name><separator>SF-<bug-report-id><separator>*
The reason for this is twofold: 1) tab completion goes faster for words. I'm not that good with SF numbers, sorry. 2) in testweb, the SF bug number will be aligned to the right this way, and hence is easier to read (as well as the first word of the description is easier to find this way).
Hence, I'd strongly suggest (I actually propose) to use the format as used for BugDay and as was in use before.
as simple as that: I (almost, see below) totally agree, "aplogise" for not thinking about this when proposing the above, and will fix the comment's in the all files as well as rename the (few) existing tests asap. I propose to set <separator> fixed to '.' . Stefan -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |