Stefan Manegold wrote:
My intention was to make your user agent (respectively the mail protocol) send your reply to both the mailing list and myself "even" if you simply say "reply" and not "group-reply"/"reply-all" or the like. I did this by setting the "Reply-To:" header to both the mailing list address and my own address --- I guess, that's how it is supposed to work ;-) (of course, since I am subscribed and do read this mailing-list, I could have omitted my own address from the "Reply-To:" header ...)
Although in the RFC, modern MUAs cannot see it, neither craft messages like that.
Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. _X_ Poster ___ This list ___ Explicit address ========
Hence, the point is basically: Since mailman does not seem to allow to extend the Reply-To: header, but only to overwrite it, one should better not touch it ... we can of course set it to "This list" anyway --- I'll check this with Sjoerd on Monday...
yes, it should be This list.
as of when?
now 2 days ago
tarball stable used to compile, will ask whether it still compiles on updated machine. (Fink was run)
Yep, this might be valuable info to localize the problem.
The stable tarbal compiles fine without any problem.