Hi all, I am trying to evaluate the performance of MonetDB for an analytical workload. I am using MonetDB-11.15.17 built from source on Ubuntu 13.04. I have encountered a problem with user using defined functions in SQL which I have reduced to this test case. I appears that whenever I have over 200,000 rows in the table, the UDF returns null. First create a test data set with the following python: import random with open("test_data.csv","w") as f: for i in range(0,1000000): f.write("%s,%s\n" % (random.random(),random.random())) Then I use the following to load the data, and try using a simple UDF in SQL. CREATE TABLE TEST ( x float, y float ); COPY 200000 RECORDS INTO TEST from '/home/alastair/test_data.csv' USING DELIMITERS ',','\n','"' NULL AS ''; CREATE FUNCTION MY_UDF (x float, y float) RETURNS float BEGIN DECLARE ret float; set ret = LOG(x/y); RETURN ret; END; SELECT 'udf alone',MY_UDF(0.1,0.2); SELECT 'udf from table',MY_UDF(t.x,t.y) FROM TEST as t limit 1; -- this returns NULL with 200000 records DROP FUNCTION MY_UDF; DROP TABLE TEST; The value returned my MY_UDF is null with 200,000 records, changing to 199,999 records in COPY INTO produces the correct result. If I use a UDF built in C, the problem does not exist at all. I feel like I might have missed something silly but I can't think of anything. Best regards, Alastair