Hi Stefan, thanks. That is clear. However, this applies for all other loader from other databases. But what MongoDB loader different from the others. Why should I just opt for this loader. What distinguishes the MonetDB-loader? Thanks Stefan Manegold wrote:
In general, bulk loading is considerably (much) faster than insert statements.
The details depend on many parameters, among others the hardware (CPU type, number of CPU cores, amount of memory, bandwidth and latency of I/O subsystem, etc.), the operating system, and the data characteristics (data types, number of columns, number of records, data volume, etc.).
Experimental assessment is required to reveal specific dateils.
Stefan
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:15:41AM -0700, Lowterm wrote:
Hi,
thanks. But I need another information for example: How fast is the MonetDB-Bulk-Loader and How fast is the MonetDB-Bulk-Loader in comparison to an insert statement. Is there another or faster commands/way except copy into.
Thanks
-- | Stefan.Manegold @ CWI.nl | DB Architectures (INS1) | | http://CWI.nl/~manegold/ | Science Park 123 (L321) | | Tel.: +31 (0)20 592-4212 | 1098 XG Amsterdam (NL) |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ _______________________________________________ MonetDB-users mailing list MonetDB-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-users
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Information-about-Loader-tp32084241p32089531.html Sent from the monetdb-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.