Hi ?????
The information provided is still insufficient to check the numbers independently
and draw any conclusion.
On 13/07/2020 08:52, - - wrote:
> hi Martin,
> monetdb version: 11.37.7-20200529
> sql: generic insert — INSERT INTO table(id,v1,v2,v3,v4) VALUES (…);
What is the table schema?
> test: same environment for both servers: vmbox 8gb, 4 cores, only one server is running on tests, no load of the host server
> php 7.4.5, SQLAnyhwere pdo extension; php-monetdb-1.0-1.el8.noarch.rpm
Did you looked at the bulk loading advice?
https://www.monetdb.org/Documentation/SQLReference/DataManipulation/BulkInputOutputWhich provides bulk insert from the MonetDB client, but whose functionality has not
been carried over to all APIs.
> script: same for both tests except connection, measured only loop execution, the script uses «random» functions to
> generate data for insert
Please share the script to make the test explicit.
> function str_random($length = 3200)
> {
> $pool = '0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ';
> return substr(str_shuffle(str_repeat($pool, $length)), 0, $length);
> }
A funny routine to create a database with non-sense text permutations of a fixed length.
This is far away from a real-world application case.
And if the table only contains text columns, I am curious why you would consider a row/column store at all.
A document or key/value store would probably be more appropriate unless you have specific query set in mind as well,
e.g. a collection text pattern queries??
Please, share the query set as well.
regards, Martin
> the execution time ratio for all tests was almost the same. each test was done on «clean» server.
> one of the test:
> monetdb: Work: 796.90835905075 seconds
> SQLA: Work: 382.80270600319 seconds
> /alex
>
> Понедельник, 13 июля 2020, 8:44 +03:00 от Martin Kersten <
martin@monetdb.org>:
> Hi <who am i talking to?>
>
> There can be many reasons. Ranging from version used, SQL difference, test running, en PHP? API.
> Based on the information provided this can not be judged.
>
> regards, Martin
>
> On 13/07/2020 02:13, - - wrote:
> > I have run the series of INSERT tests in PHP for monetdb and SAP SQLAnywhere. The tests show: performance of the monetdb on INSERT operations is almost twice slower against SQLA with the equal conditions (DDL, index, data, autocommit, 10K records),
> > monetdb is in in-memory mode . What can be a reason?
> > p.s. It is not benchmark, I just used the SQLA test server already running.
> > --
> > - -
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users-list mailing list
> >
users-list@monetdb.org </compose?To=users%2dlist@monetdb.org>
> >
https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
>
users-list@monetdb.org </compose?To=users%2dlist@monetdb.org>
>
https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list>
> --
> - -
>
> _______________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
>
users-list@monetdb.org>
https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list>
_______________________________________________
users-list mailing list
users-list@monetdb.orghttps://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list