Fabian Groffen schrieb:
On 15-02-2006 08:54:29 +0100, Niels Nes wrote:
if executed from a java program, the statement returns the exception "protocol violation: unexpected line in data block:" The 2.8.2 version had a default result size of 250 rows. So all seems fine. The way to fix this problem is to set the reply size. For example SET REPLY_SIZE=1000;
That shouldn't cause JdbcClient to spit out the protocol violation error. Or better, not spit it out. The reason this last row is missing for sure has to do with the protocol violation JDBC reports. I will look into it.
Do you have by any chance also the 251 INSERT statements for easy testing for me? As I stated, for example another table with a smaller rowsize, gives me 2750 result rows instead of expected 10000. (using ver. 2.10). Using 2.8.2 there was no problem with exactly the same tables.
However, I've send the script to Fabian, so he tries to look into it. Anyone, who wants to give it a try himself should leave me a mail, thanks