[MonetDB-users] The worst of this is that the Times is making proclamations based on ideology, not science or facts, and their wire service is picked up by hundreds of papers across the country.

The cream of the crop for 2007 - GET IN EARLY! DSDI IS SET TO ROCK YOUR PORTFOLIO! DSI Direct Sales, Inc. Symbol: DSDI Price: $0.05 There is a MASSIVE PROMOTION underway this weekend! This is hot, read the news and get on DSDI first thing Monday! Does it mean we should maximize short-term gains while sacrificing long-term opportunities? Which is just what American consumers or the beef industry does not need. Alternatively, publication of an abstract with a link to the originating source page to see the full text is generally allowed. He can also discuss global food-safety issues and the surveillance and reporting systems that are in place to protect California agriculture. ' Dissident Ranchers On Mad Cows: 'Do As I Say . First, it will result in a decline in consumer demand due to the loss of consumer confidence in the safety of beef. He was raised on a beef cattle ranch and still manages the family ranches. Yet his Vanity Fair piece offers not a shred of evidence that a mad-cow crisis is about to pounce. They may not get anything at all. Are we really that afraid of the Canadians? " Referring to the feed ban, "there is no conclusive scientific proof that it is the only route, and it is unknown what other routes of transmission may be available. Such expertise will not be evident at most major media outlets. The OIE has even stated that it does not recommend against importing beef from countries with a high BSE risk. Food and Drug Administration's advisory committee on BSE. " "Allowing the import of Canadian cattle into the U. "In June 2004, the USDA implemented this enhanced BSE testing program to provide further assurance that the risk for BSE in the U. They were absolutely not concerned about food safety. But now its time has passed, and we must begin to recognize what happened as a regulatory success story. These unintended consequences jeopardize our future and the future of the next generation of cattle ranchers. "APHIS began an enhanced surveillance program on June 1 and to date has tested over 121,000 samples for BSE. They are just samples from Cebull's nearly 30-page opinion full of such stuff and the suit filed by R-CALF has more. This year, the lab has performed approximately 15,000 screening tests for BSE. , like most nations, simply shut its border to infected countries. The American Meat Institute responded to the incident, reminding consumers that "beef is safe and consumers needn't worry about news of a new 'inconclusive' test result.
participants (1)
-
Veronica Atkinson